UK Labour Market Data Update

November 19, 2025
Full version
Just the highlights ✨
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Last week saw the publication of the latest set of ONS labour market data. Once again, the ONS has said that the Labour Force Survey (LFS) data is likely to be subject to what it describes as “further improvements” and so its data should be treated with “additional caution”. The disparity between this data set and the HMRC Real Time Indicators data appears to have widened further in October, which must cast even more doubt on the ONS’s ability to accurately estimate how many people are in work in the UK and, by definition, on its estimates of baseline productivity. Having said that, assuming consistent ONS inaccuracy, one can draw various conclusions from this latest set of data.

  1. The labour market has continued to weaken.
  2. Unemployment is up and vacancies are down.
  3. This is partly down to increased worker participation and slightly lower inactivity.
  4. Total hours worked was apparently down 0.5% in Q3 2025.
  5. Somewhat ironically, given that output is likely to have risen in Q3, this means that productivity improved throughout the quarter, coinciding nicely with the OBR’s imminent productivity forecast downgrade to be revealed in the budget statement.

So, with unemployment rising to 5% and wage growth continuing to slow (private sector settlements now down to 3%), it now looks like a near certainty that rates will fall at the December MPC meeting to 3.75%. In my view, the committee should have cut a week ago, but better late than never.

In summary, these data show a weakening labour market and are consistent with lower rates. Indeed, considerably lower rates in my view, which I expect to be down at about 3% during the course of 2026. Lower interest rates are what I think catalyse lower saving, higher spending and better growth outcomes for the UK economy in 2026 and beyond.

Finally, it’s worth mentioning that the causes of higher unemployment are, in my view, a combination of the initial implications of the AI industrial revolution, combined with the impact of the budget changes introduced in October last year, which increased the costs of employing people and were always going to result in a lower demand for labour.

The ONS has published another batch of labour market data, and once again it warns that its Labour Force Survey should be treated with “additional caution”. The gap between the LFS and the more reliable HMRC Real Time Indicators has widened further, raising fresh doubts about how accurately the ONS can estimate employment — and therefore productivity.

Even allowing for the ONS’s consistent inaccuracies, the direction of travel is clear. The labour market is weakening: unemployment has risen to 5%, vacancies have continued to fall, and total hours worked dropped slightly in Q3. Ironically, because output likely rose in the quarter, this means measured productivity actually improved — just as the OBR prepares to downgrade its own productivity forecasts for the upcoming budget. You couldn’t make it up.

With wage growth now easing (private sector settlements around 3%), a December rate cut to 3.75% looks all but certain. In truth, the MPC should have moved already, but better late than never. I expect interest rates to fall further through 2026, down towards 3%. Lower rates will, in my view, trigger lower saving, higher spending and stronger growth from next year onwards.

The rise in unemployment has two obvious drivers: the early effects of the AI industrial revolution, as businesses invest in capital rather than labour, and the October budget changes that raised the cost of employing people — inevitably reducing labour demand.

It’s also worth noting how quickly some of last year’s doom-laden narratives have fallen apart. Not long ago we were told the UK was heading for the IMF, with gilt yields cited as proof. Since then, 30-year yields have dropped from nearly 5.7% to below 5.2%, and the 10-year from 4.8% to 4.39%. Funny how the media loses interest once the numbers stop fitting the story.

Disclaimer: These articles are provided for informational purposes only and should not be construed as financial advice, a recommendation, or an offer to buy or sell any securities or adopt any particular investment strategy. They are not intended to be a personal recommendation and are not based on your specific knowledge or circumstances. Readers should seek professional financial advice tailored to their individual situations before making any investment decisions. All investments involve risk, and past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results. The value of your investments and the income derived from them may go down as well as up, and you may not get back the money you invest.

Related posts

No items found.

Introducing W4.0

Direct access to Neil Woodford’s proven investment strategies.

Subscribe to receive Woodford Views in your Inbox

Subscribe for insightful analysis that breaks free from mainstream narratives.